Systems, methods and devices for satellite navigation reconciliation

ABSTRACT

A three-dimensional map of an environment with buildings is used to computationally predict locations and times of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) transmission quality. A global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver can reconcile received satellite transmissions with these predicted satellite transmissions. By comparing actual transmission quality with predicted transmission quality, a system can determine unmodeled obstructions, temporary obstructions, jamming, spoofing or other origins of interference with predicted transmission quality of a satellite in a GNSS.

If an Application Data Sheet (“ADS”) has been filed on the filing dateof this application, it is incorporated by reference herein. Anyapplications claimed on the ADS for priority under 35 U.S.C. §119, 120,121, or 365(c), and any and all parent, grandparent, great-grandparent,etc., applications of such applications, are also incorporated byreference, including any priority claims made in those applications andany material incorporated by reference, to the extent such subjectmatter is not inconsistent herewith.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of the earliest availableeffective filing date(s) from the following listed application(s) (the“Priority Applications”), if any, listed below (e.g., claims earliestavailable priority dates for other than provisional patent applicationsor claims benefits under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) for provisional patentapplications, for any and all parent, grandparent, great-grandparent,etc., applications of the Priority Application(s)).

Priority Applications

NONE

If the listings of applications provided herein are inconsistent withthe listings provided via an ADS, it is the intent of the Applicants toclaim priority to each application that appears in the PriorityApplications section of the ADS and to each application that appears inthe Priority Applications section of this application.

All subject matter of the Priority Applications and the RelatedApplications and of any and all parent, grandparent, great-grandparent,etc., applications of the Priority Applications and the RelatedApplications, including any priority claims, is incorporated herein byreference to the extent such subject matter is not inconsistentherewith.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to navigation systems and morespecifically to modeling environments to reconcile detected satellitesystem behavior with predicted global navigation satellite systembehavior.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a global navigation satellite system(GNSS) modeling system consistent with embodiments disclosed herein.

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating GNSS modeling consistent withembodiments disclosed herein.

FIG. 3 is a diagram of an environment with satellite transmissionspoofing consistent with embodiments disclosed herein.

FIG. 4 is a diagram of an environment with satellite transmissionjamming consistent with embodiments disclosed herein.

FIG. 5 is a diagram of a GNSS receiver consistent with embodimentsdisclosed herein.

FIG. 6 is a process diagram of a set of GNSS receivers interacting witha GNSS service consistent with embodiments disclosed herein.

FIG. 7 is a process diagram of a set of GNSS receivers interacting in apeer-to-peer configuration consistent with embodiments disclosed herein.

FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating a method for predicting transmissionquality consistent with embodiments disclosed herein.

FIG. 9 is a flow chart illustrating a method for empirically reconcilingblockage information consistent with embodiments disclosed herein.

FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram of a GNSS service consistent withembodiments disclosed herein.

FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of a computing system consistent withembodiments disclosed herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

A detailed description of systems and methods consistent withembodiments of the present disclosure is provided below. While severalembodiments are described, it should be understood that the disclosureis not limited to any one embodiment, but instead encompasses numerousalternatives, modifications, and equivalents. In addition, whilenumerous specific details are set forth in the following description inorder to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments disclosedherein, some embodiments can be practiced without some or all of thesedetails. Moreover, for the purpose of clarity, certain technicalmaterial that is known in the related art has not been described indetail in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the disclosure.

Techniques, apparatus and methods are disclosed that enable a globalnavigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver to reconcile receivedsatellite transmissions with predicted satellite transmissions. Bycomparing actual transmission quality with predicted transmissionquality, a system can determine unmodeled obstructions, temporaryobstructions, jamming, spoofing or other origins of interference withpredicted transmission quality of a satellite in a GNSS.

For example, a three-dimensional spatial map of an environment withbuildings (or other man-made structures) can be used to computationallypredict locations and times of GNSS blockages (e.g., low satellitetransmission quality at a location). For example, in urban environments(e.g., New York City) some GNSS satellites are occluded by buildings.These blockages can be a predicable event. A computing system can make amap showing which satellites are or are not visible as a function bothof location within the city and time (based at least in part onsatellite orbits). This map can be made empirically (by actuallymeasuring signals at different locations and times) or virtually (givena digital model of the city and knowledge of the orbits). Such maps canbe made on a satellite-by-satellite basis, using a given satellite'sbehavior (as the behavior depends on time in orbit relative to Earth'srotation). The map can enable a mobile GNSS receiver to determine whichsatellites to use in a given situation. The computing system candetermine when a given satellite will enter or leave a GNSS receiverview during a route (or a contiguous set of locations). The map can bestored in the GNSS receiver (or a host of the GNSS) or can be stored bya network service. This mapping can also be used to determine situationsthat include multi-path effects for a given satellite.

In some embodiments, a GNSS receiver can share data and correlateresults. In an embodiment, unexpected obstructions to satellitetransmissions (as seen by degraded transmission quality) are correlated.Using this correlation, an obstruction can be determined and added to athree-dimensional map. In one embodiment, temporary obstructions can bedifferentiated from permanent obstructions (such as by time of day ofobservations, etc.).

In some embodiments, a GNSS receiver or service can determine activeinterference with GNSS. A GNSS receiver can use simulation to determineinconsistencies with simulated results that can indicate externalactions such as spoofing, jamming or other active measures to interferewith GNSS operation. In an embodiment, a GNSS receiver determines that aresult of a simulation indicates that a satellite transmission has a lowpredicted transmission quality. A received transmission with a highertransmission quality can indicate spoofing. In another embodiment, asimulation indicates that a satellite transmission has a high predictedtransmission quality. A low transmission quality can indicate jamming.In one embodiment, a higher than expected background noise indicatesjamming.

A GNSS can include global satellite systems, regional satellite systemsand enhanced systems. Satellite systems include the global positioningsystem (GPS), GLONASS, Beidou navigation satellite system (BDS),Galileo, doppler orbitography and radio-positioning integrated bysatellite (DORIS), Indian regional navigational satellite system (IRNSS)and quasi-zenith satellite system (QZSS). Enhanced systems include widearea augmentation system (WAAS), European geostationary navigationoverlay service (EGNOS), multi-functional satellite augmentation system(MSAS), GPS-aided geo-augmented navigation (GAGAN), StarFire, assistedGPS (A-GPS or aGPS) and differential GPS (DGPS).

In one embodiment, a satellite visibility system can include storagethat holds a three-dimensional spatial map that includes buildings.Using satellite ephemeris data and a position within the map at a time,a satellite signal transmission can be simulated from the satellite tothe position at the time within the map. A transmission quality of thetransmission can be estimated based on the simulation. In someembodiments, multiple satellites can be simulated. In other embodiments,satellite transmissions can be modeled over time (such as at a fixedlocation, or over a route) taking into account satellite motion, Earthrotation, and user motion.

In an embodiment, a navigation system can predict transmission qualitiesof satellite signals over time in an urban environment that includesbuildings. The transmission qualities can be simulated over time topredict if or when the transmission qualities will degrade below aquality threshold. When too few satellite signals are above atransmission quality threshold, a navigation position can be difficultto determine and/or unreliable (also known as an outage). Thetransmission qualities can also be simulated over time to predict aduration of an outage. When the transmission qualities are predicted todegrade below a quality threshold and/or for a threshold period of time,the navigation system can be configured to use a backup navigationsubsystem with less or zero reliance on the satellites (e.g., inertialnavigation, assisted global positioning system (A-GPS), differentialglobal positioning system (DGPS), etc.).

In some embodiments, a navigation system can use the predictedtransmission quality from simulated transmissions in thethree-dimensional maps to determine positional quality estimates. In oneembodiment, a navigation system can determine multi-path effects (suchas time spread) during the simulation of transmissions of thethree-dimensional environment using buildings. Simulations can alsoinclude estimates that include building materials and numbers ofsatellites. In an embodiment, a positional quality estimate can berepresented by a shape that forms a contour (e.g., circle or ellipse) ofuncertainty of the current position. As the positional quality degrades,the size of the shape increases, showing a greater uncertainty of theposition. In one embodiment, a positional quality can be estimated overtime, including a duration of a positional quality below a positionalquality threshold.

In some embodiments, a GNSS receiver can be network-connected. In anembodiment, a GNSS receiver can be connected to a local, regional and/orglobal network. In one embodiment, a GNSS receiver can be connected witha network service that provides navigation support (such asthree-dimensional maps, satellite data, warm start information,satellite maps, time dependent service coverage maps or other navigationand/or simulation information). In another embodiment, the GNSS receivercan be connected with other GNSS receivers through the network. In anembodiment, GNSS receivers share information, such as updated maps,unexpected blockages, or other measurements, predictions, estimatesand/or data.

In some embodiments, a network service can provide some or all of thesimulation processing results and/or navigation data to a connected GNSSreceiver. In several embodiments, the GNSS receiver offloads processingto a network service. In one embodiment, a GNSS receiver provides aposition and time to a network service and receives data describingpredicted transmission qualities of satellites. In another embodiment, aGNSS receiver provides a route to a network service and receivespredicted outage information. In one embodiment, a GNSS receiverprovides a current position to a network service and receives a set ofupdates on simulated transmission qualities of satellites along a routeestimated by the network service. In other embodiments, a GNSS receiverreceives updated information from a network service. In an embodiment, aGNSS receiver receives updated three-dimensional maps from the networkservice.

In one embodiment, a GNSS receiver can communicate with other GNSSreceivers in a peer-to-peer fashion. In one embodiment, the peer-to-peerconnections are over a wide-area network (such as the Internet). Inanother embodiment, the peer-to-peer connections are over a localnetwork connection (such as a device-to-device connection). In someembodiments, the GNSS receivers share data, such as transmission qualityhistory, updated maps, inconsistencies between measured and predictedinformation, blockage information, etc. In an embodiment, local GNSSreceivers share computing resources (such as splitting up computingtasks, computing positions, detecting satellite ephemeris data, orsimulating satellite positions) by computing in parallel and sharingresults.

In some GNSS systems (such as GPS) a satellite transmission includes apseudorandom code, satellite ephemeris data and almanac data. Thepseudorandom code identifies a satellite from which the transmissionoriginates. The satellite ephemeris data can include information aboutsatellite location (current and/or predicted), timing and satellitehealth. Almanac data can describe coarse orbital parameters of thesatellite and other satellites in the GNSS.

In one embodiment, a GNSS receiver uses trilateration to determinelatitude, longitude and altitude. By aligning an internal clock withreceived transmissions from satellites (taking into account delays inreceipt), a GNSS receiver can determine a distance away from a satellitebased on a delay of transmission to receipt. By combining these distancemeasurements with satellite ephemeris data, a GNSS receiver candetermine its position. Using historical information, a GNSS receivercan also determine speed, direction, acceleration and otherposition-based information. Based on signals from three satellites, aGNSS receiver can estimate latitude and longitude using trilaterationand an assumption of the Earth as a sphere. Based on signals from fouror more satellites, a GNSS receiver can estimate latitude, longitude andaltitude.

By using a three-dimensional map to estimate transmission quality ofsatellite transmissions to a GNSS receiver, decisions can be made basedon GNSS navigation quality (such as number of satellites havingtransmission quality above a transmission quality threshold, expectedduration of a threshold number of satellites having transmission qualityabove a transmission quality threshold, expected duration of satelliteshaving transmission quality below a transmission quality threshold,etc.).

GNSS based systems can also be used to enable location-based servicesbesides route guidance. Location based services can include routing,fleet services, medical services and directed advertising. In oneembodiment, GNSS services can be used to predict location based servicesquality (which can include Internet connectivity quality). For example,a GPS receiver can use aGPS information (e.g., cellular towers, wirelesslocal area network (WLAN or Wi-Fi™) signals) to predict locationdetermination time (e.g. GPS “lock-on” time) as well as cellular signalstrength. In another embodiment, WLAN signals are used to supplement lowquality GNSS signals and aid in prediction of a location indoors throughuse of a database of WLAN access point locations. In another embodiment,a hybrid GPS system is used which can use GPS signals, cell towersignals, wireless internet signals, Bluetooth™ sensors, IP addressesand/or network environment data.

GNSS based systems can also be used to predict location-based-servicequality and/or compare predicted location-based-service quality betweenroutes. Simulations of GNSS systems can include supplemental simulationsor information in the three-dimensional map, such as cell towers andreference sites. For example, a GPS system can use aGPS information(cellular towers, etc.) and/or DGPS information (reference sites, etc.)in its simulation to predict location-based-service quality. Assatellite signals transmission quality changes in spacetime insimulation, the aGPS and/or DGPS behavior can be simulated in spacetimeto determine effects on location-based-service quality. The simulatingsystem can recommend a route based on the predictedlocation-based-service quality. In some embodiments, the predictedlocation-based-service quality is Internet service quality.

In one embodiment, routing information is delivered to a roboticvehicle. The vehicle can be dependent on a data link which includes alink with a GNSS service to provide routing information. The GNSSservice can provide rating on routes based at least in part on efficacyfor location-based services (including location-based cellular services,etc.). The route can then be delivered to the robotic vehicle over thedata link.

FIG. 1 is a diagram 100 of a GNSS modeling system 102 that uses athree-dimensional map 112 containing buildings 114 with satelliteephemeris data to predict GNSS coverage of a spacetime location 122. TheGNSS modeling system 102 can create a model 103 of an environment usinga three-dimensional map 112 (such as those created by light detectionand ranging (LIDAR) or other methods). Using attributes 104 of thepredicted spacetime location 122 (such as latitude, longitude, altitudeand time) and satellite ephemeris data, satellite transmission qualitycan be predicted.

In the embodiment shown, satellites 106, 108 and 110 are modeled toprovide transmissions 116, 118 and 120 to the spacetime location 122.Transmissions 118 and 120 are predicted to have a high transmissionquality (shown by solid lines), while transmission 116 is predicted tobe blocked by a building 114 and become a low quality transmission(shown by the dashed line).

In some embodiments, the GNSS modeling system 102 can include othermodeling techniques. For example, a line of sight from the spacetimelocation 122 and a satellite is modeled to be a high qualitytransmission. The GNSS can also model non-line of sight situations,which provide a degraded quality transmission (such as blocking by abuilding or the Earth). The GNSS modeling system 102 can useconstruction material (composition data) to determine reflection,refraction, transmittance and/or absorption of signal transmissions fromthe satellites 106, 108 and 110. In another example, the GNSS modelingsystem 102 can estimate multi-path effects from reflections in betweenbuildings 114 (such as delay and/or frequency spread). These models canaid in determining an uncertainty in predicted navigation positiondetermination.

In some embodiments, a navigation quality can be determined using themodel 103. In some embodiments, if a minimum number of satellites 106,108 and 110 having a predicted transmission quality that exceeds atransmission quality threshold is not met, then a navigation quality canbe predicted to be degraded. When a navigation quality is sufficientlydegraded, it is called an outage. In some embodiments, a minimum of foursatellites with a transmission quality that exceeds a transmissionthreshold is needed to provide accurate latitude, longitude and altitudeestimates. In an embodiment, a minimum of three satellites with atransmission quality that exceeds a transmission threshold is needed toprovide accurate latitude and longitude estimates.

In some embodiments, predictions are on a per-satellite basis. For agiven spacetime location, the model indicates which satellites have aclear line of sight. The model can indicate how many and whichsatellites a given spacetime location should be able to access. In someembodiments, this information is used to determine when and where a GNSSsystem will have insufficient (such as less than four) satellites inview. In some embodiments, this information is used to determine whichsatellites a GNSS receiver should attempt to access. In someembodiments, this information is used to determine the effect whichtransmissions from specific satellites will have on location accuracyprovided by a GNSS receiver at a spacetime location, and can be used todetermine not only which satellites the GNSS receiver should attempt toaccess, but also their relative priority and/or the order in which theyshould be accessed.

In addition to blockage information, a three-dimensional map can be usedto predict multipath effects in some embodiments. The predictions caninclude a time spread for each satellite's signals at a given spacetimelocation, a strength of reflected signals and a frequency spread. Thisprediction can be computed whether or not the satellite line of sight isblocked. This prediction (or predictions) can be used to determine wherealternative navigation systems (such as AGPS) are needed. In someembodiments, spatial locations that suffer frequent blockages can beselected as prime candidates for alternative navigation systems.

FIG. 2 is a diagram 200 illustrating GNSS modeling. In some embodiments,a GNSS modeling system can create a time dependent coverage map 212. Inthe embodiment shown, a GNSS receiver can apply the time dependentcoverage map 212 to a route 222. Based on the time dependent coveragemap 212, transmissions 224 and 226 will be obstructed by a building 214during the route 222. Transmissions 228, 230 and 232 will have line ofsight and are predicted to have a high transmission quality along theroute 222.

A time dependent coverage map 212 can be obtained by different sources.In one embodiment, a central service computes the time dependentcoverage map 212. The central service can then provide the map and/orupdates to the map through a network (such as a wireless network (e.g.,cellular, wireless local area network (WLAN), personal area network(PAN), etc.)) to the GNSS system. In some embodiments, the serviceprovides an application programming interface (API) to allow GNSSreceivers to request the time dependent coverage map 212. In otherembodiments, the service can provide a push message to provide the timedependent coverage map 212. In another embodiment, a GNSS receivercalculates the time dependent coverage map 212 itself. In yet anotherembodiment, GNSS receivers can share time dependent coverage mapsthrough peer networking. In one embodiment, GNSS receivers shareprocessing resources and compute a time dependent coverage map 212 inparallel.

In some embodiments, satellite transmission quality predictions can bemade for travel along a route. These transmission quality predictionscan include a determination of which satellites are predicted to beavailable at any spacetime location along the route. The predictions caninclude when and/or where a single satellite, or full GNSS, outage willoccur along a route and for how long given travel along the route. Forexample, if a satellite “k” is currently obstructed, the GNSS modelingsystem can tell when it will become available and for how long. Ifsatellite k is currently available, the GNSS modeling system can tellwhen it will become obstructed.

The time dependent coverage map 212 can be based on a three-dimensionalmap and satellite ephemeris data. Satellite ephemeris data can includeinformation about a satellite 206 and a constellation of satellites. Forexample, satellite ephemeris data from the satellite 206 can indicatethat the satellite 206 moves along a trajectory 202.

In some embodiments, predictions as to length of outages and number ofsatellites involved can be used to decide how to deal with an outage. Ifsatellite k is predicted to be visible for a short period, thenavigation system can decide not to attempt to use it. If an outage(along the route) is short, the navigation system can decide to rely oninertial backup. If the outage is predicted to last longer, thenavigation system can engage alternative navigation systems (e.g.,inertial systems, augmented systems such as AGPS systems, etc.). In oneembodiment, a decision as to which type of alternative system to useduring an outage can depend on how many satellites are still available(and their directions).

In addition to computational predictions based on a three-dimensionalmap of the environment, the predictions can include empirically measuredblockage information from GPS receivers at various spacetime locations.These measurements can come from a local receiver or from otherreceivers (e.g., peer-to-peer, or report to a service). Thesemeasurements may be used to infer locations of obstructions.

The predictions can be made into a time dependent coverage map, allowingusers to get coverage information for any desired spacetime location.The coverage map can be made on board each GPS receiver, using either anon-board or service-based three-dimensional map of the environment. Inan embodiment, a coverage map can be provided by an off-board entitywhich supplies the information to GNSS receivers.

In some embodiments, the predictions can be used to diagnose coverageissues. A low signal level for satellite k at a location where coverageshould exist can indicate an unmodeled obstruction. If a locus ofblockages of lines of sight converges, a fixed obstruction can beinferred from the blockages, allowing the fixed obstruction to be addedto the three-dimensional map. If the lines-of-sight blockages do notconverge, this result can indicate a temporary obstruction (e.g., from anearby vehicle).

An application of the modeling system is used in some embodiments, shownin FIGS. 3 and 4, to identify spoofing or jamming. If the modelingsystem predicts, using the map, that satellite k has a low transmissionquality at the time/location, then a “signal” from the satelliterepresents a spoofing attempt. If the modeling system predicts, usingthe map, that satellite k has a high transmission quality at thetime/location, then a low transmission quality due to high noiserepresents a jamming event, whereas a low transmission quality due tolow signal strength represents a blockage event.

FIG. 3 is a diagram of an environment 300 with satellite transmissionspoofing. In the embodiment shown, a modeling system predicts, using afour-dimensional spacetime map 312 (i.e., a time-dependentthree-dimensional spatial map), that a predicted transmission 324 from asatellite 306 is obstructed by a building 314 to form a predicteddegraded transmission 326 having a low transmission quality to aposition 322. However, a GNSS receiver at the position 322 receives ameasured transmission 328 of high transmission quality that appears tobe from the satellite 306, but is from a spoofing system 302. A GNSSreceiver can determine that a spoofing attempt is occurring due to thedifference between a predicted transmission quality of the predicteddegraded transmission 326 having a low transmission quality and themeasured transmission 328 having a high transmission quality. Forexample, an apparently valid serial number (S/N) for satellite k at alocation where coverage is predicted to not exist can indicate aspoofing attempt.

FIG. 4 is a diagram of an environment 400 with satellite transmissionjamming. In the embodiment shown, a modeling system predicts, using afour-dimensional spacetime map 412, that a predicted transmission 424from a satellite 406 will have a high transmission quality to a location422 due to line of sight between the satellite 406 and the location 422.However, a GNSS receiver at the position 322 receives a measureddegraded transmission 426 having a low transmission quality to thelocation 422 due to the jamming by a jamming system 402. A GNSS receivercan determine that at least one of an unmodeled blockage or a jammingattempt is occurring due to the difference between a predictedtransmission quality of the predicted transmission 424 having a hightransmission quality and the measured transmission having a lowtransmission quality. In addition, a high noise level can furtherindicate jamming rather than blockage. For example, a high noise levelfor a satellite k at a location where coverage should exist can indicatejamming.

FIG. 5 is a diagram 500 of a navigation system 502 that includes a GNSSreceiver 506. The navigation system 502 can include a navigation controlsystem 504, the GNSS navigation subsystem 506, an augmented GNSS system(such as an aGPS navigation system 510), a secondary navigationsubsystem (such as inertial navigation system 514), a network interface520 and storage 528. The navigation system 502 can determine whichnavigation subsystem to select based on predicted effectiveness. Thepredicted effectiveness can be computed by the navigation control system504 and/or received through a network interface from a network service526. For example, when a GNSS navigation subsystem 506 is predicted tobe less effective, an augmented GNSS system (such as the aGPS navigationsystem 510) or an inertial navigation system 514 can be selected foruse.

Depending on the embodiment, a GNSS modeling system can be incorporatedinto the receiver or a GNSS service. In some embodiments, the navigationcontrol system 504 can predict satellite transmission qualities to aposition at a time using a GNSS prediction system 518. The navigationcontrol system 504 can retrieve information from storage 528 and modelsatellite transmissions to a location at a time as described above(e.g., in conjunction with FIGS. 1 and 2). For example, the navigationcontrol system 504 can retrieve a three-dimensional map from map storage530 and satellite ephemeris data from satellite data storage 532 (and/orfrom satellite signals received through the GNSS receiver 506). Usingdetermined route data (which can be retrieved from route data storage534 or predicted based on position history retrieved from historystorage 536), the navigation control system 504 can model satellitetransmissions in the three-dimensional maps to an expected spacetimelocation of the navigation system 502 using the GNSS receiver 506. Thispredicted data can be used to determine whether to rely on the GNSSreceiver 506, engage augmented systems (such as the aGPS system 510 witha GPS antenna 512) or use alternate navigation systems (such as theinertial navigation system 514 with inertial sensors 516).

In some embodiments, the navigation control system 504 can communicatewith the network service 526 over the network interface 520 (connectedto an antenna 522) to receive information for predicting satellitetransmission qualities. The navigation control system 504 can performall or some computations locally or rely on the network service 526 toreceive data (e.g., three-dimensional maps, ephemeris data, coveragemaps, time dependent coverage maps, predicted transmission quality data,etc.). For example and in one embodiment, the navigation control system504 receives an updated three-dimensional map from the network service526 over a wireless network 524 (such as a cellular network, WLAN, PAN,etc.). The navigation control system 504 can store the updated map inmap storage 530 and use it in future modeling of satellitetransmissions. In some embodiments, the navigation control system 504can use an offline cache 538 to store data for when communication withthe network service 526 is unavailable.

In another embodiment, the network service simulates a model ofsatellites over time and provides a time dependent map to the navigationcontrol system 504. The navigation control system 504 can then use thepredicted coverage map to make decisions regarding navigation (such asrelying on a GNSS receiver, using alternate navigation, waiting for anoutage to pass, estimating position based on historical data and/orpredicted data, etc.).

In an embodiment, the network service simulates a model of satellitesover time in a three-dimensional map with buildings and provides apredicted satellite transmission quality at a spacetime position. Themodel can simulate a transmission of satellite navigation signals from aset of satellites to a set of locations. The simulation can be requestedby the navigation control system 504 through an API of the networkservice 526. The simulation can be performed by the network service 526and reported to the navigation control system 504 based on priorrequests and a predicted route with timing.

In another embodiment, the navigation control system 504 can provideGNSS receiver data to the navigation service 526 and receive results.For example, the navigation control system 504 can provide the receivedtransmission data to the network service 526. The network service 526can compare the measured data (signal strength, timing, noise, thereceiver's derived position estimate, etc.) to predicted data (signalstrength, timing, noise, a position estimate predicted from satellitedata and a three-dimensional map, etc.). The network service 526 canthen report the predicted position, anomalies (such as jamming orspoofing) and/or suggested recommendations for navigation.Recommendations for navigation can be based on predictions of outages,determined spoofing or jamming, and/or measured satellite transmissionqualities. The network service 526 can also correlate multiple reportsof unexpected low transmission qualities to determine temporary orpermanent unmodeled obstructions.

In some embodiments, the navigation control system 504 can communicatewith the GNSS receiver 506 to compare received GNSS signals (over anantenna 508) to predicted GNSS signals. The navigation control system504 can use these anomalies to determine unmodeled obstructions,spoofing or jamming, and/or to make decisions on navigation.

FIGS. 6 and 7 describe processes in which data from multiple GNSSreceivers can be correlated to determine new information about theenvironment which can be shared among the GNSS receivers. In FIG. 6,this correlation and processing can be performed by a central service.In FIG. 7, the correlation and processing can be performed in apeer-to-peer environment.

FIG. 6 is a process diagram 600 of a set of GNSS receivers interactingwith a GNSS service. The process can be accomplished by a system such asthe one shown in FIG. 5 including a plurality of navigation systems 502and the network service 526. The process involves a plurality of GNSSnavigation systems 602, 604 and 606. The process includes the GNSSnavigation systems 602, 604 and 606 predicting satellite transmissionqualities in operation 610. The GNSS navigation systems 602, 604 and 606report to a GNSS service 608 a failure of the prediction to matchmeasured transmission qualities in operation 612 at a position and time.The GNSS service 608 correlates the results in operation 614. The GNSSservice then, at operation 616, sends updated obstruction information(such as a three-dimensional map with an obstruction removed or added)to GNSS navigation systems 602, 604 and 606.

For example, GNSS navigation system #1 (602), predicts a satellitetransmission quality using a three-dimensional map and satelliteephemeris data in block 618 a. GNSS navigation system #2 (604), predictsa satellite transmission quality using a three-dimensional map andsatellite ephemeris data in block 618 b. This repeats with a pluralityof GNSS navigation systems up to N systems, including GNSS navigationsystem #N (606) which predicts a satellite transmission quality using athree-dimensional map and satellite ephemeris data in block 618 x. TheGNSS navigation systems 602, 604 and 606 then perform a sensing oftransmission quality in blocks 620 a, 620 b and 620 x that matches theprior prediction in blocks 618 a, 618 b and 618 x. At least some of thepredictions do not match the measured satellite transmission quality.These failures are reported to the GNSS service 608. GNSS navigationsystem #1 (602) reports the failure to match in operation 622 a. GNSSnavigation system #2 (604) reports the failure to match in operation 622b. GNSS navigation system #N (606) reports the failure to match inoperation 622 x. The GNSS service 608 correlates reports in block 624until the correlation converges (e.g., a previously unknown obstructionis identified or a previously known obstruction is removed) in block626. The GNSS service 608 then sends an update (such as an updatedthree-dimensional map, an updated coverage map, etc.) to the GNSSnavigation systems 602, 604 and 606 in operation 616. The GNSSnavigation system #1 (602) receives a transmission from the GNSS service608 in operation 628 a. The GNSS navigation system #2 (604) receives atransmission from the GNSS service 608 in operation 628 b. Thiscontinues to include the GNSS navigation system #N (606) receiving atransmission from the GNSS service 608 in operation 628 x.

FIG. 7 is a process diagram of a set of GNSS receivers interacting in apeer-to-peer configuration. The process can be accomplished by a systemsuch as shown in FIG. 5 including a plurality of navigation systems 502.The process involves a plurality of GNSS navigation systems 702, 704 and706. The process shows an example when GNSS navigation system #1 (702)begins in peer-to-peer network communication range of GNSS navigationsystem #2 (704) during operation 710, moves out of range duringoperation 714 and then back in range for operation 718. GNSS navigationsystem #2 (704) begins out of peer-to-peer network communication rangeof GNSS navigation system #N (706) during operation 710, moves in rangeduring operation 714 and then back out of range for operation 718.

The GNSS navigation systems 702, 704 and 706 perform a prediction inoperation 708. The GNSS navigation systems 702, 704, while withincommunication range, share information wherein predictions of satellitetransmission qualities did not match measured satellite transmissionqualities, in operation 710. The GNSS navigation systems 702, 704perform correlation of the shared data in operation 712 in an attempt todiscover unknown obstructions or remove obstructions fromthree-dimensional maps. The GNSS navigation systems 702, 704 and 706perform another prediction in operation 713. The GNSS navigation systems704, 706, while within communication range, share information whereinpredictions of satellite transmission qualities did not match measuredsatellite transmission qualities, in operation 714. The GNSS navigationsystems 704, 706 perform correlation of the shared data in operation 716in an attempt to discover unknown obstructions or remove obstructionsfrom three-dimensional maps. Updated three-dimensional maps can beshared with GNSS navigation systems 702, 704 and 706 in operation 718.

For example, the GNSS navigation systems 702, 704 and 706 determinepredicted satellite transmission qualities in operation 708. GNSSnavigation system #1 (702) predicts transmission qualities fromsatellites in block 720 a. GNSS navigation system #2 (704) predictstransmission qualities from satellites in block 720 b. GNSS navigationsystem #N (706) predicts transmission qualities from satellites in block720 x. The GNSS navigation systems 702, 704 and 706 then sense measuredsatellite transmission qualities in blocks 722 a, 722 b and 722 xrespectively. Significant deviations between predicted satellitetransmission quality and measured transmission quality can be sharedbetween the GNSS navigation systems 702 and 704 when they are inpeer-to-peer network range in operation 710. GNSS navigation system #1(702) reports deviations to GNSS navigation system #2 (704) intransmission 724 a. GNSS navigation system #2 (704) reports deviationsto GNSS navigation system #1 (702) in transmission 724 b. The GNSSnavigation systems 702 and 704 then perform a correlation operation 712.GNSS navigation system #1 (702) performs a correlation operation inblock 726 a and updates an internal map with discovered information(such as potential new obstructions or potential obstructions that areno longer present) in block 728 a. GNSS navigation system #2 (704)performs a correlation operation in block 726 b and updates an internalmap with discovered information (such as potential new obstructions orpotential obstructions that are no longer present) in block 728 b.

The prediction operations, report operations and correlation operationscan repeat until it is determined that a new obstruction is present or aprevious obstruction is no longer present on a three-dimensional mapthat includes buildings. In the example shown, the GNSS navigationsystems 702, 704 and 706 determine predicted satellite transmissionqualities in operation 713. GNSS navigation system #1 (702) predictstransmission qualities from satellites in block 730 a. GNSS navigationsystem #2 (704) predicts transmission qualities from satellites in block730 b. GNSS navigation system #N (706) predicts transmission qualitiesfrom satellites in block 730 x. The GNSS navigation systems 702, 704 and706 then sense measured satellite transmission qualities in blocks 732a, 732 b and 732 x respectively. Significant deviations betweenpredicted satellite transmission quality and measured transmissionquality can be shared between GNSS navigation systems 704 and 706 whenthey are in peer-to-peer network range in operation 714. GNSS navigationsystem #2 (704) reports deviations to GNSS navigation system #N (706) intransmission 734 b. GNSS navigation system #N (706) reports deviationsto GNSS navigation system #2 (704) in transmission 734 x. The GNSSnavigation systems 704 and 706 then perform a correlation operation 716.GNSS navigation system #2 (704) performs a correlation operation inblock 736 b and updates an internal map with discovered information(such as potential new obstructions or potential obstructions that areno longer present) in block 738 b. GNSS navigation system #N (706)performs a correlation operation in block 736 x and updates an internalmap with discovered information (such as potential new obstructions orpotential obstructions that are no longer present) in block 738 x.

Due to the correlation operation 736 b performed by GNSS navigationsystem #2 (704), an obstruction was discovered and added to thethree-dimensional map in block 738 b. This updated map can be shared viaa network connection (shown here as a peer-to-peer connection, but otherconnections are also possible, e.g., network service, repository, WLAN,PAN, etc.) as shown in operation 718. In the embodiment shown, GNSSnavigation system #2 (704) transmits the updated three-dimensional mapto GNSS navigation system #1 (702) in transmission 740. GNSS navigationsystem #1 (702) then updates its map with the new information in block742. Depending on the embodiment, the update can be informationdescribing the change to the three-dimensional map (e.g., an addition),or an update to a portion of a three-dimensional map, or an update ofthe entire three-dimensional map.

FIGS. 8 and 9 describe methods that can be used to predict satellitetransmission quality in an environment with buildings. In FIG. 8, amethod is shown that predicts satellite transmission quality based on athree-dimensional map and satellite ephemeris data. In FIG. 9, thepredicted transmission quality is compared with measured transmissionquality to identify significant differences.

FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating a method 800 for predictingtransmission quality. The process can be accomplished by a system suchas shown in FIG. 5 including a plurality of navigation systems 502and/or the network service 526. In block 802, a GNSS navigation systemdetermines a position that is outside buildings and a time within athree-dimensional map for modelling. In block 804, the GNSS navigationsystem determines a satellite position at the time based at least inpart on satellite ephemeris data. In block 806, the GNSS navigationsystem simulates a signal transmission from the satellite to a positionand time using the three-dimensional map and satellite ephemeris data.In block 808, the GNSS navigation system determines a predictedtransmission quality associated with the signal transmission.

FIG. 9 is a flow chart illustrating a method 900 for empiricallyreconciling blockage information. The process can be accomplished by asystem such as shown in FIG. 5 including a plurality of navigationsystems 502 and/or the network service 526. In block 902, a GNSSnavigation system determines a position that is outside buildings and atime within a three-dimensional map for modeling. In block 904, the GNSSnavigation system determines a satellite position at the time based atleast in part on satellite ephemeris data. In block 906, the GNSSnavigation system simulates a signal transmission from the satellite toa position and time using the three-dimensional map and satelliteephemeris data. In block 908, the GNSS navigation system determines apredicted transmission quality associated with the signal transmission.In block 910, the predicted transmission quality is compared with ameasured transmission quality. In block 912, the GNSS navigation systemdetermines interference information based on the comparison in block 910(such as jamming, spoofing, unmodeled obstructions, removal of modeledobstructions, modeling of temporary obstructions, etc.).

FIG. 10 is a system diagram illustrating a system 1000 configured toprovide services to a GNSS navigation system over a network (such as anInternet 1014) consistent with embodiments disclosed herein. A GNSSnavigation system can communicate with a service 1016 over the Internet1014 as described above. The service 1016 can include load balancers1002 capable of decryption, application servers 1004, storage 1006,control servers 1010 and/or a logging server 1008. The load balancers1002 can receive requests from GNSS navigation systems and format therequests to be received by the application servers 1004. The applicationservers 1004 can receive data from the GNSS navigation systems, causedata to be stored by data servers with storage 1006 and model satellitetransmissions from a satellite to a location on a three-dimensional mapat a time. The application servers 1004 can provide results (such aspredicted transmission quality, time dependent coverage map, etc.) tothe load balancers 1002, which transmit the results to GNSS navigationsystems. Database servers with storage 1006 can store data regarding theGNSS navigation system, satellite ephemeris data, routes, positions,history and/or user and/or device account information. A control server1010 can monitor systems of the service 1016 and/or cause servers to beadded to pools of servers (such as the load balancers 1002, applicationservers 1004 and/or database servers 1006). The control server 1010 canalso provide data integrity/redundancy services such as causingsnapshotting, caching and/or other features. The logging service 1008can track usage and operations performed by the service 1016 and onbehalf of the service 1016.

In one example, a user can set up an account with the service 1016 usingan application on a mobile device. The user registers an account withthe service 1016. The service 1016 can store user credentials in storage1006.

FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of a computing system 1100 consistentwith embodiments disclosed herein. The computing system 1100 can beviewed as an information passing bus that connects various components.In the embodiment shown, the computing system 1100 includes a processorhaving logic 1102 for processing instructions. Instructions can bestored in and/or retrieved from memory 1106 and a storage device 1108that includes a computer-readable storage medium. Instructions and/ordata can arrive from a network interface 1110 that can include wired1114 or wireless 1112 capabilities. Instructions and/or data can alsocome from an I/O interface 1116 that can include such things asexpansion cards, secondary buses (e.g., USB), devices, etc. A user caninteract with the computing system 1100 though user interface devices1118 and a rendering system 1104 that allows the computer to receive andprovide feedback to the user.

Embodiments and implementations of the systems and methods describedherein may include various operations, which may be embodied inmachine-executable instructions to be executed by a computer system. Acomputer system may include one or more general-purpose orspecial-purpose computers (or other electronic devices). The computersystem may include hardware components that include specific logic forperforming the operations or may include a combination of hardware,software, and/or firmware.

Computer systems and the computers in a computer system may be connectedvia a network. Suitable networks for configuration and/or use asdescribed herein include one or more local area networks, wide areanetworks, metropolitan area networks, and/or Internet or IP networks,such as the World Wide Web, a private Internet, a secure Internet, avalue-added network, a virtual private network, an extranet, anintranet, or even stand-alone machines which communicate with othermachines by physical transport of media. In particular, a suitablenetwork may be formed from parts or entireties of two or more othernetworks, including networks using disparate hardware and networkcommunication technologies.

One suitable network includes a server and one or more clients; othersuitable networks may contain other combinations of servers, clients,and/or peer-to-peer nodes, and a given computer system may function bothas a client and as a server. Each network includes at least twocomputers or computer systems, such as the server and/or clients. Acomputer system may include a workstation, laptop computer,disconnectable mobile computer, server, mainframe, cluster, so-called“network computer” or “thin client,” tablet, smart phone, personaldigital assistant or other hand-held computing device, “smart” consumerelectronics device or appliance, medical device, or a combinationthereof

Suitable networks may include communications or networking software,such as the software available from Novell®, Microsoft®, and othervendors, and may operate using TCP/IP, SPX, IPX, and other protocolsover twisted pair, coaxial, or optical fiber cables, telephone lines,radio waves, satellites, microwave relays, modulated AC power lines,physical media transfer, and/or other data transmission “wires” known tothose of skill in the art. The network may encompass smaller networksand/or be connectable to other networks through a gateway or similarmechanism.

Various techniques, or certain aspects or portions thereof, may take theform of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media,such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, magnetic or opticalcards, solid-state memory devices, a nontransitory computer-readablestorage medium, or any other machine-readable storage medium wherein,when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such asa computer, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the varioustechniques. In the case of program code execution on programmablecomputers, the computing device may include a processor, a storagemedium readable by the processor (including volatile and nonvolatilememory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and at leastone output device. The volatile and nonvolatile memory and/or storageelements may be a RAM, an EPROM, a flash drive, an optical drive, amagnetic hard drive, or other medium for storing electronic data. One ormore programs that may implement or utilize the various techniquesdescribed herein may use an application programming interface (API),reusable controls, and the like. Such programs may be implemented in ahigh-level procedural or an object-oriented programming language tocommunicate with a computer system. However, the program(s) may beimplemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case,the language may be a compiled or interpreted language, and combinedwith hardware implementations.

Each computer system includes one or more processors and/or memory;computer systems may also include various input devices and/or outputdevices. The processor may include a general purpose device, such as anIntel®, AMD®, or other “off-the-shelf” microprocessor. The processor mayinclude a special purpose processing device, such as ASIC, SoC, SiP,FPGA, PAL, PLA, FPLA, PLD, or other customized or programmable device.The memory may include static RAM, dynamic RAM, flash memory, one ormore flip-flops, ROM, CD-ROM, DVD, disk, tape, or magnetic, optical, orother computer storage medium. The input device(s) may include akeyboard, mouse, touch screen, light pen, tablet, microphone, sensor, orother hardware with accompanying firmware and/or software. The outputdevice(s) may include a monitor or other display, printer, speech ortext synthesizer, switch, signal line, or other hardware withaccompanying firmware and/or software.

It should be understood that many of the functional units described inthis specification may be implemented as one or more components, whichis a term used to more particularly emphasize their implementationindependence. For example, a component may be implemented as a hardwarecircuit comprising custom very large scale integration (VLSI) circuitsor gate arrays, or off-the-shelf semiconductors such as logic chips,transistors, or other discrete components. A component may also beimplemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmablegate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices, orthe like.

Components may also be implemented in software for execution by varioustypes of processors. An identified component of executable code may, forinstance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks of computerinstructions, which may, for instance, be organized as an object, aprocedure, or a function. Nevertheless, the executables of an identifiedcomponent need not be physically located together, but may comprisedisparate instructions stored in different locations that, when joinedlogically together, comprise the component and achieve the statedpurpose for the component.

Indeed, a component of executable code may be a single instruction, ormany instructions, and may even be distributed over several differentcode segments, among different programs, and across several memorydevices. Similarly, operational data may be identified and illustratedherein within components, and may be embodied in any suitable form andorganized within any suitable type of data structure. The operationaldata may be collected as a single data set, or may be distributed overdifferent locations including over different storage devices, and mayexist, at least partially, merely as electronic signals on a system ornetwork. The components may be passive or active, including agentsoperable to perform desired functions.

Several aspects of the embodiments described will be illustrated assoftware modules or components. As used herein, a software module orcomponent may include any type of computer instruction orcomputer-executable code located within a memory device. A softwaremodule may, for instance, include one or more physical or logical blocksof computer instructions, which may be organized as a routine, program,object, component, data structure, etc., that perform one or more tasksor implement particular data types. It is appreciated that a softwaremodule may be implemented in hardware and/or firmware instead of or inaddition to software. One or more of the functional modules describedherein may be separated into sub-modules and/or combined into a singleor smaller number of modules.

In certain embodiments, a particular software module may includedisparate instructions stored in different locations of a memory device,different memory devices, or different computers, which togetherimplement the described functionality of the module. Indeed, a modulemay include a single instruction or many instructions, and may bedistributed over several different code segments, among differentprograms, and across several memory devices. Some embodiments may bepracticed in a distributed computing environment where tasks areperformed by a remote processing device linked through a communicationsnetwork. In a distributed computing environment, software modules may belocated in local and/or remote memory storage devices. In addition, databeing tied or rendered together in a database record may be resident inthe same memory device, or across several memory devices, and may belinked together in fields of a record in a database across a network.

Reference throughout this specification to “an example” means that aparticular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connectionwith the example is included in at least one embodiment of the presentinvention. Thus, appearances of the phrase “in an example” in variousplaces throughout this specification are not necessarily all referringto the same embodiment.

As used herein, a plurality of items, structural elements, compositionalelements, and/or materials may be presented in a common list forconvenience. However, these lists should be construed as though eachmember of the list is individually identified as a separate and uniquemember. Thus, no individual member of such list should be construed as ade facto equivalent of any other member of the same list solely based onits presentation in a common group without indications to the contrary.In addition, various embodiments and examples of the present inventionmay be referred to herein along with alternatives for the variouscomponents thereof. It is understood that such embodiments, examples,and alternatives are not to be construed as de facto equivalents of oneanother, but are to be considered as separate and autonomousrepresentations of the present invention.

Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics maybe combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In thefollowing description, numerous specific details are provided, such asexamples of materials, frequencies, sizes, lengths, widths, shapes,etc., to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of theinvention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, thatthe invention may be practiced without one or more of the specificdetails, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In otherinstances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shownor described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.

Although the foregoing has been described in some detail for purposes ofclarity, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications maybe made without departing from the principles thereof. It should benoted that there are many alternative ways of implementing both theprocesses and apparatuses described herein. Accordingly, the presentembodiments are to be considered illustrative and not restrictive, andthe invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but maybe modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.

Those having skill in the art will appreciate that many changes may bemade to the details of the above-described embodiments without departingfrom the underlying principles of the invention. The scope of thepresent invention should, therefore, be determined only by the followingclaims.

1. A device for predicting satellite visibility, comprising: storageconfigured to store a three-dimensional spatial map of one or morebuildings within an environment and satellite ephemeris data; and aprocessor configured to: determine a position and a time within thethree-dimensional spatial map; determine a satellite position at thetime based at least in part on the satellite ephemeris data; simulate asignal transmission from the satellite to the position at the time basedat least in part on the three-dimensional spatial map; and compute apredicted transmission quality associated with the signal transmissionat the position and the time; and compare the predicted transmissionquality with a measured transmission quality from the satellite at theposition and the time to determine empirically measured blockageinformation, wherein the position is outside each building of thethree-dimensional spatial map.
 2. The device of claim 1, wherein theprocessor is further configured to determine one or more positions foruse with a secondary navigational system based on the empiricallymeasured blockage information.
 3. The device of claim 2, wherein thesecondary navigational system is assisted global positioning system.4-5. (canceled)
 6. The device of claim 1, further comprising a peer topeer network interface.
 7. The device of claim 6, wherein the measuredtransmission quality is received over the peer to peer networkinterface.
 8. The device of claim 6, wherein to compare the predictedtransmission quality against the measured transmission quality furthercomprises: receive, from one or more secondary devices as peers, a setof measured transmission qualities obtained from a set of positionsassociated with a set of times; and infer a blockage location within thethree-dimensional spatial map of the environment based at least in parton the set of measured transmission qualities.
 9. The device of claim 1,further comprising a network interface.
 10. The device of claim 9,wherein the measured transmission quality at the position and the timeis received over the network interface from a service.
 11. The device ofclaim 10, wherein the processor is further configured to communicatewith the service through an application program interface (API) toreceive the measured transmission quality.
 12. The device of claim 10,wherein to compare the predicted transmission quality against themeasured transmission quality further comprises: receive, from theservice, a set of measured transmission qualities obtained from a set ofpositions associated with a set of times; and infer a blockage locationwithin the three-dimensional spatial map of the environment.
 13. Thedevice of claim 12, wherein the processor is further configured to addthe blockage location to the three-dimensional spatial map of theenvironment.
 14. The device of claim 12, wherein the processor isfurther configured to determine the blockage location is temporary basedat least in part on the set of measured transmission qualities. 15-17.(canceled)
 18. The device of claim 1, wherein the processor is furtherconfigured to: determine a second satellite position of a secondsatellite at the time based at least in part on the satellite ephemerisdata; simulate a second signal transmission from the second satellite tothe position at the time based at least in part on the three-dimensionalspatial map; compute a second predicted transmission quality associatedwith the second signal transmission at the position and the time; andcompare the second predicted transmission quality with a second measuredtransmission quality from the second satellite at the position and thetime to form additional empirically measured blockage information; andupdate the empirically measured blockage information based at least inpart on the additional empirically measured blockage information. 19.The device of claim 18, wherein the processor is further configured todetermine a number of satellites from a set of satellites, the number ofsatellites each having a signal transmission quality at or above aquality threshold at the position and the time.
 20. The device of claim19, wherein the processor is further configured to determine whether thenumber of satellites is at or above a navigation threshold.
 21. Thedevice of claim 20, wherein the navigation threshold is four signaltransmissions.
 22. The device of claim 19, wherein the processor isfurther configured to transmit information associated with the number ofsatellites. 23-31. (canceled)
 32. The device of claim 1, wherein thethree-dimensional spatial map comprises compositional data for at leastone of the buildings.
 33. The device of claim 1, wherein the processoris further configured to transmit information associated with thepredicted transmission quality.
 34. The device of claim 33, wherein theinformation comprises specification of a spacetime region neighboringthe position and the time for which the predicted transmission qualityis at or above a specified quality threshold.
 35. The device of claim33, wherein the information comprises specification of a spacetimeregion neighboring the position and the time for which the predictedtransmission quality is below a specified quality threshold.
 36. Amethod for determining global navigation satellite system (GNSS) qualitycomprising: determining a position and a time within a three-dimensionalmap of one or more buildings within an environment; determining asatellite position at the time based at least in part on satelliteephemeris data for the satellite; simulating a signal transmission fromthe satellite to the position at the time; and determining a predictedtransmission quality associated with the signal transmission; anddetermining that a measured transmission quality is inconsistent withthe predicted transmission quality at the position and time. 37-43.(canceled)
 44. The method of claim 36, further comprising transmittinginformation associated with the satellite and the predicted transmissionquality to a client device. 45-52. (canceled)
 53. The method of claim36, further comprising determining a set of predicted transmissionqualities of a set of satellites in the GNSS based at least in part onthe three-dimensional time map; and determining a predicted positionalquality of the GNSS at the position and the time based at least in parton the set of predicted transmission qualities.
 54. The method of claim53, further comprising determining a spacetime location is a candidatefor supplementing the GNSS with a secondary navigation system based atleast in part on the set of predicted transmission qualities.
 55. Themethod of claim 36, wherein determining that a measured transmissionquality is inconsistent with the predicted transmission quality furthercomprises determining that a noise level of the measured transmissionquality is inconsistent with the predicted transmission quality.
 56. Themethod of claim 55, wherein determining the noise level of the measuredtransmission quality is inconsistent with the predicted transmissionquality further comprises determining the noise level is consistent withjamming.
 57. The method of claim 36, wherein determining that a measuredtransmission quality is inconsistent with the predicted transmissionquality further comprises determining that a difference between themeasured transmission quality and the predicted transmission quality isat or above a differential threshold.
 58. The method of claim 57,wherein determining the difference between the measured transmissionquality and the predicted transmission quality is at or above thedifferential threshold further comprises determining the measured signaltransmission is consistent with spoofing.
 59. The method of claim 36,wherein determining that a measured transmission quality is inconsistentwith the predicted transmission quality further comprises determiningthat the measured transmission quality is lower than predicted.
 60. Themethod of claim 59, wherein determining the measured transmissionquality is lower than predicted further comprises determining themeasured transmission quality is consistent with a temporaryobstruction.
 61. The method of claim 59, wherein determining themeasured transmission quality is lower than predicted further comprisesdetermining the measured transmission quality is consistent with anobstruction missing from the three-dimensional time map.
 62. The methodof claim 61, further comprising adding the obstruction to thethree-dimensional time map.
 63. The method of claim 36, whereinsimulating the signal transmission from the satellite to the position atthe time further comprises simulating transmissions from a set ofsatellites to one or more spacetime locations within a spacetimenavigation route.
 64. (canceled)
 65. The method of claim 63, whereindetermining the predicted transmission quality associated with thesignal transmission further comprises determining a subset of satellitesfrom the set of satellites are able to provide predicted transmissionqualities that are at or above a quality threshold at a given spacetimelocation within the spacetime navigation route.
 66. The method of claim65, wherein determining which satellites from the set of satellites areable to provide the predicted transmission qualities that are at orabove the quality threshold at the given spacetime location furthercomprises: determining a set of segments of the spacetime navigationroute that are below a threshold number of satellites providing thepredicted transmission qualities above the quality threshold based onthe three-dimensional time map of the environment and the satelliteephemeris data; and predicting degraded functionality of the GNSS alongthe set of segments.
 67. The method of claim 66, wherein predictingdegraded functionality of the GNSS along the set of segments furthercomprises determining a predicted duration of time of degradedfunctionality for a segment from the set of segments.
 68. The method ofclaim 65, wherein determining the predicted transmission qualityassociated with the signal transmission further comprises determiningthe subset of satellites is below a navigation threshold of a number ofsatellites.
 69. The method of claim 68, wherein determining the subsetof satellites is below the navigation threshold of the number ofsatellites further comprises determining a predicted duration of timethat the navigation threshold is not met. 70-92. (canceled) 93.Computer-readable storage media having collectively stored thereonexecutable instructions that, when executed by one or more processors ofa computer system, cause the computer system to at least: receive ameasured transmission quality of a signal transmission of a satellite ata spacetime position; predict a predicted transmission quality from thesatellite to the spacetime position based on a three-dimensional spatialmap of an environment and satellite ephemeris data; and determineinterference exists based at least in part on the measured transmissionquality and the predicted transmission quality.
 94. Thecomputer-readable storage media of claim 93, further comprisinginstructions that, when executed by the one or more processors of thecomputer system, cause the computer system to predict a predictedlocation based services quality.
 95. (canceled)
 96. Thecomputer-readable storage media of claim 93, wherein predict a predictedtransmission quality further comprises predicting a set of predictedlocation based services qualities along a first route and a secondroute; and further comprising instructions that, when executed by theone or more processors of the computer system, cause the computer systemto compute a recommendation of the first route or the second route basedat least in part on the predicted location based services qualities.97-101. (canceled)
 102. The computer-readable storage media of claim 93,wherein to determine the interference exists further comprises:determining that a set of measurements at a subset of a set of spacetimelocations have a set of transmission qualities lower than indicated inassociated predicted transmission qualities; and determining a locus ofmeasurements that converge to indicate an unmodeled obstruction.103-116. (canceled)